DCCC Spends $1.4 Million in 15 Districts

The DCCC filed $1.37 million worth in media buys in support of Democratic House candidates tonight. Here’s the damage:

































































































District Incumbent Group Media Buy
AL-02 Open DCCC $91,520
AL-05 Open DCCC $60,700
AZ-01 Open DCCC $183,679
AZ-05 Mitchell DCCC $168,245
AZ-08 Giffords DCCC $58,462
CT-04 Shays DCCC $119,130
FL-16 Mahoney DCCC $91,081
IL-11 Open DCCC $40,953
KY-02 Open DCCC $88,977
LA-06 Cazayoux OPHTHPAC $49,163
MD-01 Open DCCC $145,851
MI-07 Walberg DCCC $63,040
MI-09 Knollenberg DCCC $47,392
MN-03 Open DCCC $131,894
VA-11 Open DCCC $80,915

Tonight marks the first time that the DCCC has aired ads in AZ-08, FL-16, KY-02, MD-01, and VA-11.

The lone GOP-friendly media buy comes from the bastards at the American Academy of Ophthalmology, which is dropping cash in support of Republican Bill Cassidy (himself an MD) in his race against Don Cazayoux. See you in hell, eye doctors!

But don’t get the impression that this is one-sided affair just because the NRCC is holding its musket fire. Freedom’s Crotch is up with some ad buys of its own smearing Democrats:

  • AL-02: $150,000

  • IL-11: $430,000

  • NJ-03: $74,000

  • NJ-07: $500,000

The Crotch is also spending an unspecified amount on NM-01 and NV-03. Ugh.

10 thoughts on “DCCC Spends $1.4 Million in 15 Districts”

  1. The DCCC spending its hordes of $$$$ wisely. I’m still holding my breath (not literally, don’t worry!) to see when the NRCC will make good on its threat to “influence 50-60 races”. 😉

  2. If there were major federal races in Arizona this year, I could understand it. But there aren’t and McCain doesn’t look likely to lose his home state. So why is nearly $200,000 being spent opposing a no-hoper like Hay who the NRCC won’t fund?

  3. why is the DCCC still spending huge sums on AZ-01 when the Republicans have essentially pulled out? I just don’t get it. Freedom’s Crotch is going to spend millions, we’re going to need that money in places that are close.

Comments are closed.